On Friday to hold local government elections in the capital city on December 31 (tomorrow) and set aside its notification on the postponement of the polls.
The verdict was pronounced by IHC Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir, who was hearing identical petitions filed by the PTI and the Jamaat-i-Islami against the ECP’s decision — announced earlier this week.
“The Election Commission of Pakistan is directed to hold the local government elections in the Islamabad Capital Territory as per the schedule already announced i.e. on 31.12.2022,” it said.
The court also ordered the federal government to provide complete assistance to the electoral body for conducting the local bodies’ elections as mandated by the Constitution.
On Tuesday, the ECP postponed the polls “for the time being” at the last minute, frustrating thousands of contestants and their supporters.
“Keeping in view the legal provisions and the judgement of the Honourable High Court, Islamabad dated Dec 27, 2022, regarding the subject matter. Local Government Elections in ICT scheduled to be held on Dec 31, 2022, is hereby postponed for the time being,” the short order by the ECP had said.
The electoral body’s order had come after the Senate, on Dec 23, passed a bill increasing the number of UCs in Islamabad amid strong protest from the opposition. The increase in the UCs required new delimitations — a process that could take several months to complete.
Govt to file an intra-court appeal
In an interview shortly after the court’s verdict, Interior Minister Rana Sanaullah said the federal government would file an intra-court appeal against the decision.
“We respect the court” but “holding elections tomorrow is impossible,” he said, adding that the decision was announced after office timings. “How is it possible that elections can be conducted?”
Sanaullah elaborated that it was “impossible” to make the security arrangement required for the polls in the limited time.
“We had decided to call in the Rangers and Frontier Corps […] there are at least 1000 polling stations that need to be provided security,” he added.
The minister also said that after the new bill was passed, a delimitation process had to be conducted in the city which would take at least take three to four months.
On the other hand, Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar said that it was “practically impossible” to hold elections in such a short time.
“There is an option of appeal against the verdict […] and we exercise it,” he told in an interview.
Imran urges people to ‘fully take part in tomorrow’s election
Meanwhile, in a message shared on PTI Twitter, former premier Imran Khan congratulated the people of Islamabad, saying that the verdict had enabled them to elect a local government through their vote.
“It is unfortunate that the ECP is siding with the corrupt cabal of crooks that have been imposed on us […] the election commission always supports them and gives verdicts against democracy.”
Imran claimed that the “corrupt cabal of crooks is afraid of the people and is running away from elections”.
“Their only aim is to keep a grip over the country through horsetrading — buying people’s consciences through money gained from corruption”.
The PTI chief also called on the citizens of the capital to “fully take part in tomorrow’s elections” and defeat the “imported government”.
Separately, PTI Vice Chairman Shah Mahmood Qureshi, in an interview, said IHC’s decisions had defeated the incumbent government’s plan to run away from elections.
“Our hopes have grown after the decision,” he said. “The people of Pakistan will feel empowered if this (elections) happen on a national level.”
At the outset of the hearing today, ECP submitted its response to the petitions filed by PTI and JI.
It said that the election commission and the Ministry of Law were “on the same page” regarding holding polls after four months, while the Ministry of Interior had sought time to hold consultations over the matter.
For his part, PTI lawyer Sardar Taimoor Aslam argued that the ECP was trying to “put its burden” on the court.
“The court never asked you to postpone the polls,” he said, adding that the elections commission took the support of proposed legislation. “Without the signatures of the president, we can’t call it a law.”
At that, Justice Tahir inquired if an election schedule was ever challenged in court. “If no, then that means we still have an election schedule in front of us.”
Here, the director-general of ECP replied that the schedule had been postponed.
At one point during the hearing, the court asked: “If we accept the writ petitions, will the election commission be able to hold polls?”
Aslam responded that the ECP had itself said that preparations for the elections were completed and only the distribution of electoral material was remaining. “It can hold polls in a week.”
Meanwhile, Additional Attorney General (AAG) Munawwar Iqbal told the court that a meeting was held between ECP officials and the government earlier today.
“However, due to a shortage of time, the comments of the participants could not be taken into account,” he told the court.
At that, Justice Tahir asked if the federal government had become so incompetent that it could not file a response.
“Even if a response is prepared, we can’t submit it without the approval of the Ministry of Law,” AAG Iqbal contended.
“What was the reason behind increasing the UCs just 12 days before the polls,” the court pressed. “Tell us the reasons for this [move]. What will you say about assuring the court of holding the elections?”
At that, the AAG said that it was the government’s prerogative whether it wanted to hold the polls, adding that the power had been exercised twice this year.
For his part, the director-general of ECP said that the electoral body was still ready to hold elections.
“Are you,” the court inquired.
Here, the official said that the distribution of ballot papers had to be completed two days prior to the elections. “Security arrangements have to be seen as well.”
To that, Justice Tahir remarked that security arrangements had already been made in Islamabad. He also asked: “If elections are not held, the printed material would be wasted. Who would be responsible for this?”
The ECP DG replied: “The one who issued the notification”.
At that, Justice Tahir lamented that the court was “very disappointed” by the federal government’s attitude“ and reserved the verdict in the case.